Given our on-going examination of indigenous knowledge and our approaches to that through a variety of readings, when I came across these articles today, I thought of our discussions from this week and thought I would share them with you. Use them as springboards for further thinking and discussion if you like.
Regarding the Alain de Botton article on marrying the wrong person: via Why marriage is both anachronistic and discriminatory | Aeon Essays
Regarding knowing the Other (and thinking of the Tibetan monks at Davidson): The Simplistic Image of Tibetan Buddhism
Regarding knowing the Other and questions of evolution: Adapting bodies to the ocean
np: The Del-Byzanteens “Girls Imagination”
Here is a folder of docs that will be helpful.
Here is the link to the Daily Google Form you need for assessment.
Daily Progress Form
Here is the sheet I promised.
Project sheet with links
Saw this yesterday and was greatly intrigued. It is easy to think that things will always be as they are now – some psychologists argue that is our default position. But in fact, nothing remains the same. So the question is, what to do about that? How to prepare for an ever-changing future?
Where those questions get really interesting is in the area of ethics. Here is one possible ethical response to an ever-changing future. And if you would like a more philosophical examination of this issue, then check out the pieces in your ToK Reader on pp. 303, 306, and 310.
And if you were looking for example ideas for your ToK Essay, you could do worse than this one
via No Children Because of Climate Change? Some People Are Considering It – The New York Times
If you want to explore a more recent exploration about existent paradigms and possible shifts, then check this out. It gets a little technical for us non-biology types, but I made it through and was greatly intrigued. Part of my fascination is from the suggestion that if “we are all multitudes” then what does that do to psychology and/or religion?
And, are paradigm shifts ever just in one discipline, or are they part of a larger shift in the “gestalt”? Enjoy.
via Microchimerism: how pregnancy changes the mother’s very DNA | Aeon Essays