For what is coming, you are going to need this article. Need as in you will need to do things with it for a grade so bookmark it, listen to it, explore it, and come to class to find out.
You could read this as “See Mr Whiteside, at least I’m not doing drugs”
“I am hooked, and I don’t even know on what – just whatever this device pushes on me.”
It does make me think about Marx’s line: “Religion is the opiate of the masses” and how completely he underestimated technology.
these are pretty close to my exact reasons though he is way more articulate than I am. I am drawn to his point about wanting have as many unmediated experiences as possible. In many ways that is one of my chief reasons – I want to experience life as it is in front of me.
I love life. Look at this – issues of neuroscience, knowledge, knowing, self-identity. AND David Byrne!?!?!?!! Are you kidding me? Who put this together? This is ToK as it should be – weirdo musicians and ways of knowing.
The experiments look fascinating and I love the interdisciplinary thinking that Byrne is using, not unlike his band’s interdisciplinary sound (Talking Heads for those of you not in the know). Look at all the things a ToK experience can prep you for – it’s like being an explorer, just of the mind.
Given our recent readings and discussions in the Gita I found this to be an interesting look at the way we currently think about and treat those close to death in our culture. We have discussed the role of dualism in Western thought and this seems like one of the consequences of a dualist way of thinking about death. What I wonder is if the thoughts expressed towards the end of this article are beginning to take on thinking that is similar to what Krishna expresses in the Gita.
And then there is the notion that any day you think about death – and by extension the life you have now – is a good day. Enjoy.
Especially if it is made by artificial intelligence. Can AI have intention? and that is only the beginning of the questions that are possible. This article alludes to a longer piece about Google working on a different kind of AI than most using neural processing which allows for learning. If you want to explore that, here is the link for that article:
As I indulged in one of my favorite morning activities – eggs, coffee, and newspapers (we get two on Sun – the Observer and the NYTimes) and I couldn’t help but think about ToK and the role of knowledge in our lives. And, of course, I thought about you and the essay that lies ahead of you. Here goes.
As we have begun discussing the prompts for the essay and as I have encouraged you to think of this as “not a research paper”, I sense a little fear in some of you, fear that you won’t have anything “profound” to say, that you “don’t know enough, haven’t experienced enough, etc….” to do a good job on this essay. I want to try to encourage you to think again. One of the things that I really respect about the IB program is that it is a curriculum that attempts to teach you to think about how to live. Look again at the Learner Profile – nowhere in it is anything said about high IQs, profound intellectual experiences, academic achievement, or anything else we might usually associate with being “super-smart”. The attributes listed are all about how to be in the world. And that is where the ToK essay comes in.
What is being asked of you is to demonstrate that you are reflective about the knowledge that your teachers and experiences have given you, and that you risk thinking about the knowledge that you have assimilated in your life and the connections you can use it to make to the life you encounter (I can’t help myself but this should remind you of a certain Stephen Dedalus). Let me demonstrate (and hopefully encourage your thinking).
In this morning’s Arts section of the NYTimes I came across three articles that as I read them, I found myself thinking about knowledge in ToK. In this article, “The Invention That Shot Rocky Up Those Steps” which is about the history of the Steadicam use in films and how it has changed what directors can do with the camera, I couldn’t help but wonder about how a technological device can alter what we perceive and the effect that has on how we then formulate knowledge. What other devices have changed knowledge?
The next article that got me thinking was “In Jazz, Listen to the The Timeless Elders“. In this piece the writer Nate Chinen explores the longevity of numerous jazz musicians and the role that past knowledge plus in their continued success. He draws comparisons to hip-hop’s preference for constant turnover without looking down at it. This made me think about the role of the past in knowledge and how some forms of knowledge venerate the past (jazz) where others do not (hip-hop). I think that there is much to be explored in that act of looking at past knowledge and deciding how to treat it.
The third article that generated thought was “Marian Goodman, Art’s Quiet Matriarch” which profiled the founder and owner of Goodman Galleries, a famous and important art gallery in NYC. Tucked into this profile are issues about who gets to decide about how much a work of art is worth and who bears what responsibility for keeping art alive. (Again, I can’t help myself – say it with me now: “Fish”, “Kuhn”). Ideas about the value we put on knowledge, who values what knowledge, and here again, the role of past knowledge, all of these spring to mind from this piece.
What I am trying to get across is that really all you need to write a kicking ToK essay is a good newspaper, the Learner Profile, and your self with all of your own thoughts, experiences, and ideas. Don’t fret, just reflect for a moment on all that you have been through and then take the risk. It’s a lot smaller than you think.